A LOT of web hosts are becoming anti-Movable Type, because they are ignorant and claim there are many security issues.
Of course, they refuse to elaborate on these (probably because they admit there aren't many that cause great concern), but it is indeed a growing problem.
Namely, LunarPages.com, a seemingly awesome and expansive web host.
They flat out ban MT.
Another is UplinkEarth.com. They make it extremely difficult to use Movable Type.
They also name "lack of flooding controls, lack of comment-spam controls, lack of server relay protection, etc" as their flawed logic against Movable Type.
They also make the same complaints about another great product, Coppermine Gallery.
They say that because it's so popular and extensible, it's like an open sore waiting to be picked at.
However, since a majority of other hosts are fine with Movable Type and Coppermine, it makes me wonder what on earth these small but still-growing number of idiot system administrators.
I proposed the following suggestions to Six Apart:
- Send out broadcast emails to web hosts, specifically the offending hosts, announcing the new version that addresses (and 3.1* does) these "important issues"
- Set up a special section on movabletype.org that addresses these concerns
- Set up a special section on movabletype.org that lists out all the MT-friendly or MT-enabled web hosts out there, featuring "recommended" hosting via affiliate links (to help out Six Apart) for web hosts that are committed to helping Movable Type and Six Apart grow and not shrink (read: LunarPages and UplinkEarth)
- Involve the BlogOn community. Since MovableType is amongst the first, we can never rule out the fact that more blogging applications are next in their sights.
How many of you have experienced the same thing?
Can you recommend any good hosts (not the crappy cheap and obviously so hosts, but good, professional, full featured and well-rounded hosts) that allow MT to run on their systems with little-to-no fuss?
